Benchmark the DLRM Model with HPS

Benchmark Setup

We create the DLRM model with native TensorFlow and its counterpart with HPS Plugin for TensorFlow using the create_tf_models.py script. The DLRM model with native TF is in the SavedModel format and the size is about 16GB, which is almost the size of embedding weights because the size of dense layer weights is small. The DLRM model with the plugin leverages HPS to store the embedding table and perform embedding lookup. The JSON configuration file and the embedding table file required by HPS are also generated by the script.

Furthermore, we build the TensorRT engines for the DLRM model using the create_trt_engines.py script, in both fp32 and fp16 modes. The script configures the engines with the HPS Plugin for TensorRT. The workflow can be summarized as three steps: convert TF SavedModel to ONNX, perform ONNX graph surgery to insert HPS plugin layer and build the TensorRT engines with HPS Plugin for TensorRT.

We compare three deployment methods on the Triton Inference Server:

DLRM with Native TensorFlow: The experimental option VariablePolicy.SAVE_VARIABLE_DEVICES is used to enable the CPU and GPU hybrid deployment of the DLRM SavedModel, i.e., the embedding table is on CPU while the MLP layers are on GPU. This deployment method is common for native TF models with large embedding tables and can be regarded as the baseline of this benchmark. The deployment is on the Triton backend for TensorFlow.
DLRM with HPS Plugin for TensorFlow: In this DLRM SavedModel, tf.nn.embedding_lookup is replaced by hps.LookupLayer to perform embedding lookup and the MLP layers are kept unchanged. The deployment is on the Triton backend for TensorFlow.
DLRM with HPS Plugin for TensorRT: The HPS plugin layer is integrated into the built TensorRT engines, and the MLP layers are accelerated by TensorRT. The TensorRT engines are built with mininum batch size 1, optimum 1024 and maximum 131072. Both fp32 and fp16 modes are investigated. The deployment is on the Triton backend for TensorRT.

The benchmark is conducted on the A100-SXM4-80GB GPU with one Triton model instance on it. The GPU embedding cache of HPS is turned on and the cache percentage is configured as 0.2. For details about how to deploy TF models with HPS Plugin for TensorFlow and TRT engines with HPS Plugin for TensorRT on Triton, please refer to hps_tensorflow_triton_deployment_demo.ipynb and demo_for_tf_trained_model.ipynb.

After launching the Triton Inference Server, we send the same batch of inference data repeatedly using Triton Performance Analyzer. In this case, the embedding lookup is served by the GPU embedding cache of HPS and the best-case performance of HPS can be studied. The command and the sample data to measure the latency for a batch with one sample follows:

perf_analyzer -m ${MODEL_NAME} -u localhost:8000 --input-data 1.json --shape categorical_features:1,26 --shape numerical_features:1,13

{
"data":[
{
"categorical_features":[276633,7912898,7946796,7963854,7971191,7991237,7991368,7998351,7999728,8014930,13554004,14136456,14382203,14382219,14384425,14395091,14395194,14395215,14396165,14671338,22562171,25307802,32394527,32697105,32709007,32709104],
"numerical_features":[3.76171875,3.806640625,1.609375,4.04296875,1.7919921875,1.0986328125,1.0986328125,1.609375,2.9453125,1.0986328125,1.38671875,8.3984375,1.9462890625]
}
]
}

We take the forward latency at the server side as our benchmark metric, which is reported by the performance analyzer via the compute infer field:

  Server:
    Inference count: 28589
    Execution count: 28589
    Successful request count: 28589
    Avg request latency: 562 usec (overhead 9 usec + queue 9 usec + compute input 59 usec + compute infer 431 usec + compute output 53 usec)

Results

The benchmark is conducted with the Merlin TensorFlow container nvcr.io/nvidia/merlin/merlin-tensorflow:23.02 on a machine with A100-SXM4-80GB + 2 x AMD EPYC 7742 64-Core Processor. The software versions are listed below:

TensorFlow version: 2.10.0
Triton version: 22.11
TensorRT version: 8.5.1-1+cuda11.8

The per-batch forward latency, in microseconds, measured at the server side is shown in the following table and Figure 1. The Y-axis is logarithmic. The FP16 TRT engine with HPS achieves the best performance on almost all batch sizes, and has about 10x speedup to the Native TF baseline on large batch sizes.

Batch size	Native TF	TF with HPS	FP32 TRT with HPS	FP16 TRT with HPS	Speedup - FP16 TRT with HPS to Native TF
32	551	612	380	389	1.42
64	608	667	381	346	1.76
256	832	639	438	428	1.94
1024	1911	849	604	534	3.58
2048	4580	1059	927	766	5.98
4096	9872	1459	1446	1114	8.86
8192	19643	2490	2432	1767	11.12
16384	35292	4131	4355	3053	11.56
32768	54090	7795	6816	5247	10.31
65536	107742	15036	13012	10022	10.75
131072	213990	29374	25440	19340	11.06

The DLRM inference latency for different deployment methods

Figure 1. The DLRM inference latency.

Benchmark the DLRM Model with HPS

Benchmark Setup

Results

Resources